Articles and Blogs

qui tam

Fourth Circuit Says Attorney General Holds “Unreviewable Veto Power” Over Qui Tam Settlements and Sends Statistical Sampling Issue Back to the Trial Court

[02/17/17]

Posted on February 17, 2017 in False Claims Act Defense

Published by: Hall Render

The Attorney General of the United States has an unreviewable veto power over qui tam settlements, according to the Fourth Circuit’s recent published decision in United States ex rel. Michaels v. Agape Senior Community.[1] In the same decision, the court declined to decide an issue raised by the relators over the trial court’s refusal... READ MORE

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

FCA Cases Just Got Harder to Settle

[05/28/15]

Posted on May 28, 2015 in False Claims Act Defense

Published by: Hall Render

On May 26, 2015, the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Kellog Brown & Root Service, Inv. et al. v. United States ex rel. Carter, 575 U.S. ____ (2015), Case No. 12-1497. Most of the commentary on the case centers around the Court’s decision on the Wartime Suspension of Limitations Act, but... READ MORE

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Self-Disclosure, the Public Disclosure Bar and the FCA – Uncertainty, Circuit by Circuit

[02/11/15]

Posted on February 11, 2015 in False Claims Act Defense

Written by: David B. Honig

Written by David B. Honig and Ritu Kaur Cooper. On February 3, 2015, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that disclosures to the public officials responsible for managing the subject of a False Claims Act lawsuit did not qualify as “public disclosures” for the purpose of the FCA’s public disclosure bar. US ex rel. Wilson v.... READ MORE

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Qui Tam Complaints to Be Reviewed by Criminal Division

[10/01/14]

Posted on October 1, 2014 in False Claims Act Defense

Written by: David B. Honig

Leslie R. Caldwell, Assistant Attorney General for the Criminal Division, announced recently that all new qui tam complaints would be “shared by the Civil Division with the Criminal Division as soon as the cases are filed.” Fraud prosecutors will now review all qui tam complaints to determine whether to open a parallel criminal investigation. READ MORE

Tags: , , , ,

Fifth Circuit: Telecom Corporations Not Subject to FCA Claims on E-Rate Allegations

[07/08/14]

Posted on July 8, 2014 in False Claims Act Defense

Written by: Drew B. Howk

The Fifth Circuit rejected the government’s attempt to expand the FCA’s reach to include non-government funds overseen by a non-governmental entity simply because the government had the ability to exert a modicum of control over the entity. READ MORE

Tags: , , , , , ,

False Claims Act Update, May 2013

[05/15/13]

Posted on May 15, 2013 in False Claims Act Defense

Written by: David B. Honig

Three new FCA cases of interest were reported in the last few weeks. One was discussed previously on FCADefense.com in Toumey Loses Stark/FCA Case Again by Drew Howk. Another, Ulysses, Inc. v. United States is yet another example of the growing trend of failed FCA counter-claims by the Government in response to contract litigation. The Third, Fresenius... READ MORE

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Retained Overpayments Change the FCA Ball Game

[05/05/13]

Posted on May 5, 2013 in False Claims Act Defense

Written by: David B. Honig

False Claims Act defense attorneys have been warning government contractors, particularly Medicare and Medicaid providers, of increased risks and a reduced ability to defend against whistleblower complaints since the passage of the Fraud Enforcement Recovery Act of 2009 (“FERA”). The greatest risk comes from FERA’s addition of a new kind of reverse false claim:... READ MORE

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

False Claims Act Update

[02/27/13]

Posted on February 27, 2013 in False Claims Act Defense

Written by: David B. Honig

Appellate Court Cases Three appellate-level FCA cases were reported in January and February 2013. Only one, U.S. ex rel. Nathan v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America, Inc., was selected for publication. All three cases addressed Rule 9(b)’s requirement that allegations of fraud be lead “with particularity.” The cases, read together, highlight the differences among Circuits... READ MORE

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

February FCA Update

[03/13/12]

Posted on March 13, 2012 in False Claims Act Defense

Written by: David B. Honig

February was an interesting month, with one case showing how OIG advisory opinions can be taken too far, another considering fraud under a corporate integrity agreement, and a court applying burden-shifting for the first time at the appellate level in FCA retaliation cases. Cases reviewed from February are: US ex rel. Boggs v. Bright Smile... READ MORE

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

False Claims Act Update, December 2011

[01/03/12]

Posted on January 3, 2012 in False Claims Act Defense

Written by: David B. Honig

What must a successful FCA defendant show to collect attorney’s fees under the Equal Access to Justic Act? Can an error by the government create an FCA violation by a defendant relying upon the government’s acts? Does Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. US ex rel. Stevens apply to FCA retaliation cases? Can a... READ MORE

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,