February 17, 2010
Revised Anesthesia Interpretive Guidelines for Hospitals
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
On December 11, 2009, CMS issued revised interpretive guidelines for the Hospital Conditions of Participation ("CoPs") governing anesthesia services ("Guidelines"). The Guidelines provide helpful new guidance in a number of areas. For example, CMS clarifies that the regulatory requirements for administration and supervision of anesthesia services (42 CFR 482.52(a)) and for the pre- and post-anesthesia evaluations and intraoperative anesthesia records (42 CFR 482.52(b)) apply only to general anesthesia, regional anesthesia and monitored anesthesia care or "MAC" (including deep sedation), and not to topical and local anesthetics and minimal or moderate analgesia/sedation. CMS clearly states that CRNAs may administer epidurals/spinals for labor and delivery analgesia without physician supervision because analgesia is not anesthesia subject to the supervision requirements. CMS, for the first time, defines each anesthesia service in a clear and precise manner consistent with practice guidelines of the American Society of Anesthesiologists ("ASA"). The Guidelines also provide additional information addressing the minimal requirements for content of anesthesia evaluations and intraoperative reports, and the kinds and scope of anesthesia policies and procedures expected of each hospital providing anesthesia services.
Overall, the Guidelines provide welcome clarity and demonstrate CMS' effort to align regulatory requirements with industry standards. Of course, any time an agency addresses questions and ambiguities identified by stakeholders, new questions are inevitably raised. The updated Guidelines were effective immediately on their publication (December 11, 2009) and we are awaiting word as to whether they apply to critical access hospitals which have their own CoPs and interpretive guidelines.
DETAILED ANALYSIS
CMS Clearly Defines Categories of Anesthesia Services Subject to the Mandatory Administration and Supervision Requirements Set Forth in the CoPs
In the Guidelines, CMS clarifies that when a hospital provides a full range of "anesthesia services" on a continuum from local - general anesthesia, not all of such anesthesia services are considered to be "anesthesia" for purposes of meeting the administration and supervision requirements of 42 CFR 482.52(a). CMS defines "anesthesia" as consisting of "general anesthesia", "regional anesthesia", and "monitored anesthesia care" ("MAC") (MAC includes deep sedation/analgesia). Anesthesia, thus defined, must be administered by a qualified anesthesiologist; an MD/DO not an anesthesiologist; a dentist, oral surgeon or podiatrist qualified to administer anesthesia under State law; a CRNA who unless exempted under a State opt-out provision is under the supervision of the operating practitioner or of an anesthesiologist who is immediately available if needed; or an anesthesiologist's assistant who is under the supervision of an anesthesiologist who is immediately available if needed. The individual categories of anesthesia services are defined in the Guidelines found at: http://www.cms.hhs.gov/SurveyCertificationGenInfo/downloads/SCLetter10_09.pdf
Conversely, topical and local anesthetics for minor procedures, minimal sedation and moderate sedation/analgesia (i.e., conscious sedation) (collectively "Analgesia/Sedation") may be administered by CRNAs without supervision and, in fact, may be administered by other appropriately trained and qualified medical practitioners within state scope of practice law, provided, the hospital assures that Analgesia/Sedation services are provided in a safe, well organized manner and the hospital has policies and procedures governing the provision of Analgesia/Sedation.
Having framed the distinction between anesthesia and Analgesia/Sedation, CMS advises that hospitals must prepare for and be able to "rescue" a patient from the development of deeper levels of sedation than intended, given the fact that patients' responses to various medications employed in anesthesia services can be unpredictable and can include severe adverse consequences to health and safety. Rescue requires an intervention by a practitioner with expertise in airway management and advanced life support. The qualified practitioner must be able to correct adverse physiologic consequences of the deeper-than-intended level of sedation and return the patient to the originally intended level of sedation. So, for example, if a hospital permits a qualified RN, not a CRNA, to perform conscious sedation, it must assure that an appropriately qualified practitioner is standing by prepared to respond if the patient slips into a deep sedation state.
CRNAs May Provide Labor Epidurals/Spinals for Analgesia Without Supervision
Consistent with its portrayal of the anesthesia services continuum, CMS clearly takes the position that CRNAs may administer epidurals and spinals for labor and delivery analgesia without physician supervision because analgesia is not anesthesia subject to the supervision requirements. However, the anesthesia supervision requirements of 42 CFR 482.52(a) apply if the obstetrician or other attending physician determines that a C-section is necessary to safely deliver the infant and any subsequent administration of medications is for the purpose of providing anesthesia (i.e., loss of voluntary and involuntary movement and total relief of pain).
CMS Clarifies that Anesthesia Services in All Locations of the Hospital Must be Organized into One Service; Central Role of Anesthesia Service Policies and Procedures
The previous conditions of participation interpretive guidelines for anesthesia services (10/18/2008) provided that a hospital's anesthesia service is responsible for all anesthesia administered in the hospital and must be integrated into the hospital-wide QAPI program. The revised Guidelines further clarify this directive by stating that all hospital anesthesia services provided in all departments in all campuses and off-site locations must be organized into one anesthesia service under the direction of a qualified MD or DO.
The anesthesia service must develop policies and procedures governing the provision of all categories of anesthesia services including specifying the minimum qualifications for each category of practitioner permitted to provide anesthesia services that are not subject to the anesthesia administration requirements of 42 CFR 482.52(a). So, in the example given above, if a hospital permits an RN, not a CRNA, to administer conscious sedation, it must have a State law-compliant policy which describes such RN's minimum qualifications for performing conscious sedation.
Of note, for the first time, CMS addressed the issue of non-anesthesiologist physicians performing anesthesia. It stated, a hospital's anesthesia services policies must "address the circumstances" under which a physician not an anesthesiologist, or a dentist, oral surgeon or podiatrist, is permitted to administer anesthesia. Further, in formulating its policies, hospitals should conform to "generally accepted standards of anesthesia care." In the revised Guidelines and in previous interpretive guidelines, CMS referenced the practice guidelines of the ASA. Accordingly, a state surveyor would probably find anesthesia policies consistent with ASA practice guidelines to be compliant with the conditions of participation.
With reference to the mandatory supervision of CRNAs performing anesthesia by operating practitioners, CMS advised that hospitals should establish CRNA supervision policies that, again, "conform to generally accepted standards of anesthesia care." When an anesthesiologist supervises the CRNA, he/she must be "immediately available" if needed. In the Guidelines, CMS modified the definition of "immediately available" as excerpted below. The modification is mostly stylistic rather than substantive, but it is noteworthy that the new definition of "immediately available" refers only to anesthesiologists and not to operating practitioners, perhaps because it is now recognized that operating practitioners, by definition, are right in the procedure room with CRNAs.
New Definition of "Immediately Available" under Revised Guidelines
An anesthesiologist is considered "immediately available" when needed by a CRNA under the anesthesiologist's supervision only if he/she is physically located within the same area as the CRNA, e.g., in the same operative suite, or in the same labor and delivery unit, or in the same procedure room, and not otherwise occupied in a way that prevents him/her from immediately conducting hands-on intervention, if needed.
Old Definition of "Immediately Available" under Anesthesia Services Interpretive Guidelines from 10/17/2008
"Immediately available" to intervene includes at a minimum that the supervising anesthesiologist or operating practitioner, as applicable, is:
- Physically located within the operative suite or in the labor and delivery unit;
-
Prepared to immediately conduct hands-on intervention if needed; and
-
Not engaged in activities that could prevent the supervising practitioner from being able to immediately intervene and conduct hands-on interventions if needed.
Finally, the Guidelines explain that while individual operating practitioners need not be granted specific privileges to supervise a CRNA, the medical staff bylaws or rules and regulations must specify for each category of operating practitioner, the type and complexity of procedures that category of practitioners may supervise. This point was a source of confusion in previous years but hopefully the confusion will finally be put to rest as a result of the clear language set forth in the Guidelines.
Pre- and Post-Anesthesia Evaluations and Intraoperative Anesthesia Records - Required for General, Regional and MAC Only
The old guidelines specified that post-anesthesia evaluations were required after general, regional and monitored anesthesia and not after conscious sedation - but made no such distinction between Anesthesia and Analgesia/Sedation with respect to the requirements for pre-anesthesia evaluations and intraoperative anesthesia records. The Guidelines correct this ambiguity and make it clear that pre-anesthesia evaluations and intraoperative anesthesia records, also, only are required for general, regional and monitored anesthesia because conscious sedation is not anesthesia. (The Guidelines do state that patients undergoing conscious sedation should be monitored and evaluated before, during, and after the procedure by trained practitioners in accordance with current practice.)
The Guidelines also expand on the minimum requirements for the pre-anesthesia evaluation and intraoperative record and provide further guidance as to the timing of the pre- and post-anesthesia evaluations. (See Tags A-1003, A-1004 and A-1005 in the Guidelines for details-link above.) In another important clarification, physicians may not delegate the task of completing a pre-anesthesia evaluation to otherwise qualified medical personnel who are not trained to administer anesthesia. Lastly, the Guidelines stipulate that a post-anesthesia evaluation should begin when the patient is sufficiently recovered from the anesthesia so as to be able to participate in the evaluation. Except in cases where post-operative sedation is necessary for optimum medical care, the evaluation generally would not be performed immediately at the point of transfer from the OR to the recovery room.
Recommendations
Again, CMS seems to have made efforts to conform this latest round of interpretive guidelines to generally accepted practice guidelines where applicable. Hospitals should review, update and prepare the required policies and procedures outlined here, and ensure that they reflect generally accepted practice guidelines/standards of anesthesia care as endorsed by professional societies such as the ASA and American Association of Nurse Anesthetists. If the hospital uses anesthesia documentation templates, they should be revised to comply with the updated minimum requirements for pre- anesthesia evaluations and intraoperative anesthesia records.
In light of CMS' statement that a hospital must have rescue capacity for situations where patients fall into a deeper-than-intended level of sedation, hospitals may want to consider requiring that any practitioner performing procedures involving sedation or anesthesia have expertise in airway management and advanced life support. Alternatively, hospitals must adequately staff ORs, obstetrical suites, radiology departments, emergency departments, special procedures areas and other locations where anesthesia services are furnished, to ensure a qualified practitioner is always close by and ready to assist immediately if patients undergoing procedures require "rescue."
According to an ASA Analysis of the Guidelines, the revisions only apply to hospitals not classified as critical access hospitals. We were unable to independently confirm this and we are awaiting word from our Washington D.C. contacts on this matter.
Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Adele Merenstein at 317-752-4427, Tim Lawson at 317-977-1438, or your regular Hall Render attorney. |