Archive for the ‘Protected concerted activity’ Category

NLRB Loses Again – Court Vacates Employee Rights Notice Posting Rule

Authored By: Stephen W. Lyman


Notice Posting Rule Is Struck Down

Back in August 2011, the NLRB published a rule that would require private employers to post in conspicuous places a government poster intended to notify employees of their rights under the NLRA.  Business groups challenged the rule, and the NLRB delayed the effective date several times.  Then in early 2012, courts got into the act and struck down parts of the rule and eventually enjoined the rule until the appeals court heard and decided the case.  (more…)

Confidential Investigations – What Can Your Policy Say?

Authored By: Stephen W. Lyman


Confidentiality Requirements Challenged by the NLRB

Last summer, the NLRB created another stir among private employers when it found that an employer’s form used during confidential investigations of workplace issues was unlawfully broad and interfered with employee rights.  We wrote about this development in our August 7, 2012 HR Insights article Confidential Investigations – Challenged by the NLRB.  After that ruling, employers were left to guess as to what they could say about the confidentiality of workplace investigations in their policies and other documents.  Now there is some guidance, thanks to the NLRB’s Division of Advice, which released a Memorandum on April 16, 2013, suggesting policy language that would withstand NLRB scrutiny.  (more…)

NLRB Protects Speculation: Is Somebody Getting Fired?

Authored By: Stephen W. Lyman


Talk of Job Security Is “Inherently” Concerted and Protected

We all know by now that private employees are protected if they engage in concerted activity for their mutual aid or protection.  We also know that the protections afforded employees under the NLRA can be interpreted quite broadly.  The current NLRB has done just that in a case where one employee was speculating with another employee if somebody was going to be fired because a help-wanted ad for a vacant position had been posted in a local newspaper.  The NLRB ruled that any talk by any employee about “job security” or possible firing was “inherently concerted” and therefore protected even if group action never happened or was never even contemplated.  (more…)

NLRB Attacks Employer Handbooks – Again

Authored By: Stephen W. Lyman


Confidentiality, Public Relations and Blogging Policies Held to Be Unlawful

As we reported in our Employment Law News article in January, the NLRB has been very active in challenging any employer policy that could reasonably be understood by an employee to interfere with rights protected under the National Labor Relations Act (“NLRA”).  The NLRA protects private employees – whether or not a union is involved – in freely discussing wages, hours and working conditions and joining together for their mutual aid and protection.  Many common employer policies dealing with confidentiality, external communications and social media have been held to have been unlawfully overbroad and have been ordered to be rescinded.  Now in a new case decision by the NLRB involving DirecTV, specific language in four employer policies was found to be illegal.    (more…)

Are Contractual Non-Disparagement and Proprietary/Confidential Information Clauses Actually Illegal?

Authored By: Stephen W. Lyman


NLRB Judge Rules That Clauses That Are Too Broad Are Illegal

As we have seen in the recent months, the NLRB has been very focused on the rights of employees – union and non-union – to talk about their wages, hours and working conditions whether face-to-face or on Facebook.  A decision by an NLRB administrative law judge makes the point that even provisions in the employment contracts of mortgage bankers can get an employer into trouble if an employee could “reasonably believe” that the language of the contract prohibits the exercise of rights protected under the NLRA.  (more…)