THIS IS AN ADVERTISEMENT    
Employment Law News
      RESOURCES   ||   CONTACT

April 16, 2012

NLRB Employee Rights Notice Posting Rule Struck Down in its Entirety by Federal Judge

Friday the 13th was a bad news day for the NLRB but potentially a very good news day for private employers.  A federal district court judge in South Carolina on Friday, April 13, 2012 held that the NLRB's rule obligating private employers to post a notice explaining employee rights under the NLRA was beyond the NLRB's authority.  The court essentially said that the NLRB's rule was not "necessary" to carry out its role as a "reactive agency" charged with preventing unfair labor practices and conducting representation elections.  Because there was no specific direction by Congress to create a notice of rights poster, as in other federal employment laws, the NLRB exceeded its authority in requiring private employers to post this notice.  The NLRB's rule was to take effect on April 30.  Now, the overall applicability of the notice posting rule is in serious question.  As we reported in an earlier alert on March 2, 2012, another federal district court struck down only portions of the NLRB's rule dealing with penalties and statute of limitations but left standing the general posting requirement. 

What Should Employers Do Now?

With two inconsistent court decisions, the question now becomes, "What should an employer do?"  About the only thing that is clear at this time is that private employers in South Carolina need not post the NLRB poster.  For other employers, the court's ruling will not have a direct bearing on your posting obligation - so long as a Federal Appeals Court has not ruled or issued an injunction preventing the NLRB from enforcing the rule.  At this time, an appeal is, of course, likely, and there may still be some court action prior to the April 30 posting deadline.  In the meantime, private employers should consider the risks in not posting the poster and continue to monitor legal developments as the April 30 deadline approaches.

We will continue to monitor this development and will keep you informed.

Reference:   Chamber of Commerce of the United States and South Carolina Chamber of Commerce v. NLRB, (No. 2:11-co-02516-DCN, DC SC, April 13, 2012).

Click here for a copy of the court's decision.

Should you have questions, please contact your regular Hall Render attorney or a member of our Employment and Labor Section:

Steve Lyman slyman@HallRender.com
Sam DeShazer sdeshazer@HallRender.com
John Ryan jryan@HallRender.com
Michael Kim mkim@HallRender.com
Robin Sheridan rsheridan@HallRender.com
Bruce Bagdady bbagdady@HallRender.com
Craig Williams cwilliams@HallRender.com
Travis Meek tmeek@HallRender.com
Larry Jensen ljensen@HallRender.com
Jennifer Gonzalez jgonzalez@HallRender.com
Carrie Turner cturner@HallRender.com
Jon Bumgarner jbumgarn@HallRender.com
Kevin Stella kastella@HallRender.com
Dana Stutzman dstutzma@HallRender.com
Jon Rabin jrabin@HallRender.com
Jennifer Richter jrichter@HallRender.com
Natalie Dressel ndressel@HallRender.com
Mary Kate McNamara mmcnamara@HallRender.com

Employee Benefits Attorneys:

Fred Bachmann fbachmann@HallRender.com
Bill Roberts ebplans@HallRender.com
Tara Slone tslone@HallRender.com
Calvin Chambers cchambers@HallRender.com